The www.thereset.org Source Document

I have decided to publish the RE-SET source document to lay to rest the many “interesting fiction” nonsense being said about it, frankly peoples paranoia astounds me!

I have spent time (ten years) listening to the concerns of flesh and blood people in many many groups and seen and been involved in many serious issues involving thousands of people. I simply came to the conclusion that dealing with things case by case or issue by issue was not working, there needed to be a lets fix this approach and looked at the ways that others had tried that and failed but taking the best of all and tried to find a way that would not be factional, political or vested interest group based that could benefit all.

This document and a presentation that I did several times started to inspire people who helped develop voluntarily with out any organisation what has become the reset, I believe because it speaks to peoples hearts and is rooted in our history, it spoke to them, they owned it for themselves and other and they enabled it to speak to others for them to own it. 

I like others want solutions, I am not left wing or right wing or affiliated with any group, though I have spent time with many, we are all just people despite our differences. I AM ANTI CORRUPTION AND ABUSE and have been and am still prepared to do something about it. I do not take credit for the solutions in the reset, these are a synthesis of many many others work. And there are many others to come. I do say I proposed addressing things in this way and the document below is the hinge source for the reset.

There is no NWO agenda, hey the reset is saying central control is a part of the problem, there is no SOROS involved, big money is a part of the problem, there is no agenda 21 involvement this is about us having control over decisions not someone abroad, thats a part of the problem. The reset is not funded by anyone. People are just doing what they can from their own resources.

I am certainly no bodies man,  I know my liberties and those of others and have stood up mainly for others, despite what others might say, because I know my sons future depends on you all having your liberties.

The reset does however recognise constitutional facts of life, some people wont like some of these but I did not write them, but if the constitutional reset is whats needed and has worked before, we have to accept those facts too or propose something different and get unanimous agreement to that, personally I think we need to be bold and pragmatic and address the imperative issues that are causing abuses of  the people of our four nations on an epidemic scale by using what has proven to work in the past.  All are welcome to assist and later all can object to or refine any solution and propose others.

It has been said the reset will be infiltrated and controlled and even has been, and this is good reason to reject it, it has not and how I ask is it going to be possible to infiltrate control 10,000+ different communities that are not centrally administered? Especially without that being noticed by people in those communities? I suggest I watch mine and you watch yours and then cry foal if you need to.

This document is rough thesis notes only with key points it DOES NOT COVER ALL THE ISSUES I AND MANY OTHERS ARE AWARE OF and do need addressing, just the overarching ones that can enable the others to be addressed. The re-set is a process we can all take part in or say good by to your children and their children having a free future.

 

OUR PROBLEMS FROM A ENGLISHMANS PERSPECTIVE
A short analytical treatise as Basis for

CONSTITUTIONAL RE-SET:

1. Constitutional Convention
2. A Great Charter of Liberties
3. Private Bill in Parliament
2. Platform for Local Referenda in Parishes &c.

By Paul Randle-Jolliffe Esq (c) 2013

PREPOSITION:

The biggest current problem areas (for now) are three Legal Fictions; Money, Governance Hierarchy and the Administration of Law as they are currently implemented and run.

 fact assumed or created by Law or use. Legal fictions are mostly encountered under common law systems. The term “legal fiction” is not usually used in an uncomplimentary way, and has been likened to scaffolding around a building under construction.

So in these contexts the legal fictions are the frameworks within which each system operates.

It is obvious to me and many others that many of our current frameworks are dysfunctional and damaging the opposite of enabling and yet study shows though not ever perfect they did work better in the past so what has gone wrong and what can we do about it?

OUR BUILT IN FAULT IN THE CURRENT BRITISH SYSTEM

Our Party Political System hails from after the English Civil War when the Monarchy was restored but the Civil War then continued in Parliament where the factions would fight, but without Swords, Pikes and Muskets. The Core issues were never resolved and the original complaints were institutionalised into what has become a national bun fight in general elections and can be seen played out at PM’s question time every week.

We get invited to join the fight and choose a faction.

THE CIVIL WAR ISSUES WERE

  1. TAXES
  2. FREEDOM OF PERSONAL THOUGHT (Conscience)
  3. GOVERNMENT (The King) to impose A. & B. or Balanced by local Self Governance.

What we know as the Cavaliers (The Kings Men) became ‘The Tories’ (The Conservative Party) and the Roundheads (The Radical Factions) became ‘The Whigs’ (The Liberals) with ‘The Socialists’ (Labour Party) later replacing the Whigs as the bigger collection of more Radical factions.

The Civil War continues but in parliament with whomever wins elections (without Swords, Pikes and Muskets) imposing their views on the country for a period effectively with us choosing a Mobocracy.

THE FAULT NOW

The central issue is that the English Civil War issues were never resolved and have not been for 370+ years, THE WAR CONTINUES. (and we have exported this in the name of something called “Democracy” based on a conflict model)

All that happens is that one Faction or Another gets to impose their:-

  1. TAXES
  2. IDEA OF PERSONAL THOUGHT (Conscience) AKA Political Correctness

As :

  1. THE RIGHT FOR GOVERNMENT (The King) to impose A. & B. and the progressive centralisation has resulted over the centuries

They just continue to make things worse by Centralising the Power in the name of Democracy, (Which “Constitutionally” is a misnomer) increasing Taxes and imposing their will, but really this is no different to the reason for the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights and the executing of Charles 1st for insisting on his Dictatorial Divine Rights in the same areas.

We now have the equivalent of the divine right of Prime Ministers?!

Yes it’s the Civil War Continuing! Except the Parties take turns in being the Divine Dictator backed by our limited choice of one political mob or another.

But the war was fought to deal with prior despostism, here is a extract of the Scottish Convention complaining about King James the Seventh (The English James the Second)

Whereby the King, at his access to the government is obliged to swear…..to rule the people according to the laudable laws; and did by the advice of wicked  and  evil  counsellors,  invade the fundamental constitution of this Kingdom and altered it from a legal limited monarchy, to an arbitrary despotic power; and in a public proclamation, asserted an absolute power, to cass, annul, and disable all the laws .

Hello same problem now except its PM’s controlled by corporates and a thing called the EU

To enable this and entrench the central power (for no good reason), freedom under the common law system, which has been built up over centuries under freedom to do what is not forbidden, has been reversed into a Corpus Jurus (Roman Napolionic Law) EU Legal System, (including by giving EU Law superiority to English Common Law), which is the reverse of the English Common Law so we are only free to do what is permitted, thus setting in stone the New System with the Parliamentary Sovereignty (AKA Divine) Of “Democratic” Despotism but controlled from the EU and beyond..

This is not the lawful structure of our Constitution, so the above claim of right has been adjusted to speak today’s issues:

Whereas Governments & Parliaments have  in recent decades By the advyce of wicked and evill Counsellers Invade the fundamentall Constitution of this Kingdome And altered it from a legall limited monarchy to ane Arbitrary Despotick power by Political Faction Government and others not of this Realm through the House of Commons as controled by various Paritys and they have in a publick proclamation asserted ane absolute power as a lie as to the Sovereignty of Parliament to cass annull and dissable all the lawes and have subverted law and equity, the rights, interests and duties of the Estates of the Realm and this has caused fear, distress and harm to many and unneeded deaths.

The purpose of this paper is to analyse the issues and resulting problems and propose concrete solutions.

Analysis & Solution

  1. MONEY

THE PROBLEM

The Pre and Post Civil War problems were/are taxes, the war was a as result of oppressive taxes.

Since that time the state and its needs have continued to grow and yet even high and diverse taxes do not produce enough state income to meet those needs.

AN ANALOGY

Imagine you are continually hungry and can never be satisfied as there is never quite enough food to go round, yet your appetite gets larger.

THE RESULTS

Political factions compete for the interests of their own group but no one is ever satisfied.

HISTORY

Historically taxes were to cover the costs of:-

  1. Protecting from invasion.
  2. The Administering of the Common Law.
  3. Ensuring that people had the right to a place to live and work.
  4. Limited right to tax (mainly on trading) to enable the above.
  5. Acting as Trustee of Nation for the people.

And yet private interests, the Banks received £500 billion when total taxes were under £500 billion and the gov has withdrawn services resulting in many distresses.

In English History, when the taxation and other faults became unbearable the people responded to correct things as per the following examples:-

  1. Magna Carta 1215
  2. Petition of Right 1869
  3. Many others upto 45 times inbetween
  4. English Civil War
  5. Peasants’ Revolt
  6. Poll Tax Riots

THE FALLACY

We are stuck with this way of doing things.

THE ANSWER

TOTAL ECONOMIC ACTIVITY LEVY

TEAL IS THE ANSWER AS IT MEANS OTHER TAXES CAN BE ABOLISHED WHOLESALE.

Abolish all Personal: Income Tax, Council Tax, Inheritance Tax, VAT, Fuel Duty, Road Tax, Capital Gains Tax, Stamp Duty and all other taxes as well as corporation taxes on small businesses.

TEAL WOULD BE A VERY SMALL LEVY ON THE USE OF THE £

All who use it benefit from the use of the Pound Currency therefore TEAL is the ultimate FAIR TAX that is paid solely in direct proportion to Currency use!

 

TEAL WOULD ENABLE AN EVEN SPREAD OF TAX BY ECONOMIC ACTIVTY THAT WOULD SPREAD THE TAX BY ABILTY TO PAY. IF YOU’RE NOT ECONOMICALLY ACTIVE YOU WON’T PAY AND THE COST AND COMPLEXITY OF TAX COLLECTION IS ELIMINATED.

TEAL would remove this complexity as it would be a levy based upon economic activity (the use of the currency) therefore it would be ultimately fair and leave no room for any one group to argue for different treatment to another. It would be based entirely upon the ability to pay when you pay and would be 100% proportionate.  It would be beyond the so called Robin Hood Tax.

 

“TEAL is pro bono publico” [Ed.: for the public good.].
Legal as a proper tax, where all benefit nationally.

 

TEAL @ 1%  on both sides of any transaction would produce THREE TIMES more tax revenue than all existing taxes. [Ed. Sources: http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/apr/25/tax-receipts-1963%5D

2013 taxes under £500B
TEAL at 2013 figures would produce £1.5Trillion

 

It could provide for paying off the national debt of £1.2T and the £40B + PA interest
It could enhance all services
It could enable millions to be put into the hands of local people
It could provide for a national income

University fees abolished?
Unemployment would not exist
Fuel Poverty would not exist.

 

REINTRODUCE BRADBURY POUND

 

  1. Governance Hierarchy

 

THE PROBLEM

 

Current political systems have removed power from the edges and concentrated it in the middle. The main left or right parties have all added to this over the last 40 years including unlawfully giving it away to other countries the EU and UN.

 

AN ANALOGY

 

Imagine if you plug you computer into the power socket but you get no power because it is only available near the power station.

 

THE RESULTS

 

YOU ARE DISEMPOWERED this leads to being unable to function and to complaints being made but as there are no local solutions things get worse.

 

HISTORY

 

Historically in Common Law Countries (The English Model) Power was mostly local as this is the principle of common law you are free to do what is not forbidden and to self-govern. Central Government (The King) was responsible for:

 

  1. Protecting from invasion.
  2. The Administering of the Common Law.
  3. Ensuring that people had the right to a place to live and work.
  4. The limited right to tax (mainly on trading) to enable the above
  5. Acting as Trustee of Nation for the people

 

HISTORICAL FAULTS

 

In English History, and it was never perfect, when the faults became unbearable the people responded to correct things as per the following examples:-

 

  1. Magna Carta
  2. Bill of Rights
  3. English Civil War
  4. Peasants Revolt
  5. Poll Tax

THE LEGAL FALLACY

 

The legal fallacy in what has been done is contrary to the maxim that “the common law knows no superior”

not king, not parliament, not judge and not people!

 

This is confirmed by each Monarch upon being crowned.

 
 

 

But through parliament which is subject to the law, the safeguards that it can act beyond have been removed and this has been being done for a long time.

 

As an extreme example: Neither parliament nor judges can decide that murder is lawful, even we the people in a referendum cannot.

 

THE ORIGINS

 

The Charter of Liberties, also called the Coronation Charter, was a written proclamation by Henry I of England, issued upon his accession to the throne in 1100.

 

The full text of the Charter of Liberties of Henry I, 1100, issued by the King when he ascended the throne. The Charter recognised that the King granted the laws of Edward the Confessor, as amended by William the Conqueror, to the people.

 

Further Great Charters (there have been 40 in total).  Of which the current one says:-

 

“these Liberties under-written, to have and to hold to them and their Heirs, of Us and our Heirs for ever.”   

 

You cannot usurp or take what is not yours and you cannot give away what is not yours.

 

“Parliament, Politicians cannot giveaway the rights of the People” David Cameron

 

THE INEVITABLE RESULTS

 

I CANNOT FIX MY OWN PROBLEM WITHOUT THE POWER TO DO SO OR WITHOUT THE HELP OF MY LOCAL COMMUNITY.

 

Various degrees of harm that can lead to political polarisation, social fracture and rebellion. 80 year olds are commonly saying we need a revolution.

 

THE ANSWER

 

The Answer is easy

  1. To rescind or abolish Statutes that unlawfully centralised or gave away powers
  2. And  massive reversal and devolving of powers to Local Communities at Parish, Ward and Town Council level with open Community Level Consensus Democracy
  3. And to make the outcomes of Parish (etc) Referenda binding in law locally.
  4. And to make the outcomes of Parish (etc) Referenda binding on MPs & Parliament.

 

  1. Law

 

 

THE PROBLEM
As discussed (in part 1. Hierarchy) the English Common Law has been subverted by the introduction of “Corpus Jurus” EU law system, which is alien and incompatible with Common Law.

 

Confirmation of this came in the Court of Appeal where a key part of the Common Law and Statute since 1297 was said by the then Master of the Rolls Lord Neuberger (Now president of the Supreme Court)

 

The two systems cannot co-exist, as they are not compatible, one must be superior

 

AN ANALOGY

 

If you mate a Thoroughbred horse with a Donkey you get an Ass (a mule) which cannot produce any offspring, nothing productive comes out of it except as a work machine.

 

THE RESULTS

 

The rights of everyone under English Law have been removed, from the monarch on down. THE CONSTITUTION HAS BEEN WIPED OUT IN PRACTICE.

 

But our constitution does not allow that!! And just as in the past we have the right to have this addressed.

 

HISTORY (HOW IT WAS DONE)

 

(ONLY A POTTED LIST)

  1. Parliament claims IT is Sovereign and can decide anything it chooses.
  2. Parliament Act 1911
  3. A process of Centralisation (1970s) Local Government and other Acts
  4. Joining the EEC and EU LAW becomes Supreme
  5. Human Rights Act (Less rights than 1,000 years of common Law)
  6. Removal of Lords as constitutional Guarantors
  7. Supreme Court Act
  8. Access to Justice Act (1999) (denied access to justice except in EU)
  9. EU Membership & Treaties
  10. Removal of Monarch from Parliament (2013)

 

HISTORICAL

 

In English History, the law was never perfect and parliament’s job was to enable acts that:-

 

  1. Restated & Confirmed the Common Law when that was departed from
  2. Remedied where the Common Law was deficient

An example of restatement, (codifying) is the Habeas Corpus Act.

Judges could also develop the law by its Judgements and a Judge’s job, once an act was passed, was to decide if such an act of parliament was compatible with the common law. Only then did it pass into law.

Excesses of the Courts in the past have been dealt with, such as the abolition of the Star Chamber in the 1640’s, much as needs to be done with the Secret Family Courts now.

PUBLIC JUSTICE

Public Justice is a common phrase that most understand as Justice being “SEEN TO BE DONE”, whilst this is true it is much more. Public Justice in Common Law Systems is done by the Public under a Jury System, this is ancient.

One important aspect of Public Justice were Local Grand Juries which were only to be suspended in times of War.

Juries in Civil and Criminal Proceedings were the norm and Grand Juries were an especial protection for the more serious crimes, both to ensure they were dealt with and to protect from state misuse of indictments, there were other protections.

“The sheriff of every county was required to return to every Quarter Sessions and Assizes (or more precisely the commission of oyer and terminer and of gaol delivery), 24 of the county “to inquire into, present, do and execute all those things which, on the part of our Lady the Queen, shall then be commanded them” (The Sherriff could also call a local posse.)” Statute of Winchester which ran for 600 years.

They acted like a clearing house and anyone could bring a crime to a Grand Jury including against a state official and an indictment could then be preferred.

Juries have been systematically removed and replaced. The Grand Jury ceased functioning in England in 1933 and was entirely abolished in 1948.

PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS

It used to be that all prosecutions for crime were private criminal prosecutions

OUR CURRENT BRITISH SYSTEM

Most of our administration of law is dealt with administratively unless it involves indictable offences, there is no right to a jury and most crimes by public officials do not get addressed and there are secret courts that deal with the family.

 

Private Criminal Prosecutions are routinely denied.

 

In addition Corpus Jurus rules the law now, not common law, and if you want satisfaction the end of the line is in Europe not London.

 

The supreme court was established to stop any challenge to the Human Rights Act, which is an illegal act, parliament cannot stop judges from ruling on the lawfulness of the law.

 

THE FAULT NOW

The central issue is that the protections of the Public Justice Jury Systems (Petty & Grand) have been removed, which disables Public Justice and the common law no longer exists.

 

THE LEGAL FALLACY

 

The legal fallacy is that there can be Public Justice without the Public deciding the Justice of a matter.

 

  1. Is it just to indict (Grand Jury)
  2. Is it just to find guilt (Petty Jury)

 

It is said that one person cannot be judge jury and executioner but that, in effect, is what happens unless you are in crown court.

 

THE ORIGINS

 

At one time all Justice was Local and Public, it was done in Moot, (Tribal Courts), and later the king travelled dispensing justice, Constables became elected as did the magistrates who had to be from the Elected Alderman, the only place in the UK to retain its Moot System and elected Alderman & Magistrates and “Locally Controlled Police” today is the City of London.

 

Except it is the Corporations that have usurped the control in the City from the people there and from the control of the country country’s people.

 

But corporations are not one of the estates of the realm protected by the Magna Carta or the Bill of Rights etc.

 

THE INEVITABLE RESULTS

 

JUSTICE IS DENIED

 

#Hillsborough
#BloodySunday
#LynetteWhite
#DanielMorgan
#PhoneHacking
#BankingScandals

#StateChildStealing
#ChildAbuseScandals
#CrimeFigureManipulation
#DeathsInCustody
#PoliceUnacountability
#CorporateFraud
#BankBailout

#Treason

#SecretCourts

#MyriadsOfOtherInjustices

 

These don’t get dealt with or not until years later as there is no effective Public Justice System Left.

 

For instance IPPC is non functional and all the above can be dealt with by the below.

 

THE ANSWER

 

The Answer is easy

  1. A constitutional convention process of the Estates of the Realm to be convened which Parliament is in the constitution is subject to
  2. Local Referenda to enable the convention
  3. The rights of the estates of the realm to be restored by a New Charter of Liberties
  4. Monarch to Seal a Modern Confirming Charter of Liberties and declaring Void all unlawful statutes and treaties that usurp the common law
  5. A Truth, Peace and Reconciliation Commission be established by the Constitutional Convention
  6. Abolish the Supreme Court
  7. A new constitutional Court
  8. Reintroduce the Treason Laws including Treason against the Constitution
  9. Remove the Corporations Control of Elections in the City of London
  10. Abolish Secret Courts
  11. Reintroduce Local Elected Alderman as Magistrates
  12. Restore Juries and Grand Juries
  13. Grand Juries able to prefer indictments at any level
  14. Enable Private Prosecutions via Grand Juries
  15. Reconfirm the Sheriff’s Powers to form a Posse.
  16. Grand Juries to be able to issue a Warrant to Sheriff
  17. Local Commanders of Police to be Elected and Accountable to the Parishes and Wards as Moot Courts
  18. Local Officials (Elected or Not) Accountable to the Parishes and Wards as Moot Courts
  19. Abolish TAXES and introduce TEAL
  20. Remove Larges Banks ability to “make money” through the creation of credit and reintroduce the “Bradbury Pound.”
  21. Etc as the Re-set develops
  22. LOCAL AREA SOLUTIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements
Published in: on June 9, 2014 at 10:20 pm  Leave a Comment  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://jolliffe.wordpress.com/2014/06/09/the-www-thereset-org-source-document/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: